- Services
- Case Studies
- Industries
- Real Estate
- Insurance
- Music
- Healthcare
- Financial Services
- Manufacturing
- Retail & E-commerce
- Logistics & Supply Chain
- Energy & Utilities
- Construction & Infrastructure
- Automotive & Mobility
- Media & Entertainment
- Telecommunications
- Agriculture & AgTech
- Legal Services
- Government & Public Sector
- Education & EdTech
- Products
- Blog
- About Us
Self-hosted legal AI software inside your firm's tenant
Matter content, embeddings, audit logs, and chat history stay inside the firm’s tenant. No third-party data processor.
End-to-end deployment timeline from kickoff to lawyers running review and generation workflows in production.
OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini via the firm’s enterprise contract for non-sensitive work; self-hosted Llama, Mistral, or Qwen for matter-confidential workflows.
What SMB and mid-market law firms get from private legal AI
Six outcomes 30–300 lawyer firms get from a private legal AI deployment that vendor-cloud platforms (Harvey AI, Hebbia, Kira / Litera, Luminance, eBrevia) can’t match on the contractual stack.
Matter file ingestion
PDFs (scanned + native), Word, Excel, contract redlines, deposition transcripts, court filings, OCR'd correspondence, and structured exhibits — every messy real-world legal document the vendors quietly drop chunks of.
Clause-library calibration
The firm's market positions, preferred clauses, and matter-type playbooks loaded into the system. Anomaly detection flags deviations during review; the firm's preferred language surfaces automatically during generation.
Citation enforcement
Every clause suggestion, review flag, redline, and answer links to a source paragraph in the firm's matter corpus. Defensible to the partner, client, GC, post-close auditor, or bar reviewer.
OCG + bar compliance by default
Matter content stays inside the firm's tenant. No third-party data processor. ABA Opinion 512 risk evaluation, OCG AI-use disclosure, NDA AI clauses, UK SRA, Federation, and Law Council rules pass review automatically.
BYO-LLM routing
OpenAI, Anthropic, or Gemini via the firm's enterprise contract for general work; self-hosted Llama, Mistral, or Qwen for matter-confidential workflows. Same UX for the lawyer; different model on the back end based on the matter.
Per-matter access controls
Each matter gets its own access policy mapped to the firm's SSO group membership. Ethical screens, matter walls, and folder-level permissions survive into the AI layer. Every query, retrieval, and response logged for audit.
Why Harvey, Hebbia, and Kira fall short for SMB and mid-market firms
Vendor legal AI platforms (Harvey AI, Hebbia, Kira / Litera, Luminance, eBrevia, Spellbook, LexisNexis Protégé, Casetext CoCounsel) all ship comparable workflow depth for contract review, contract generation, legal research, and matter-corpus chat. The pricing is built for the AmLaw 100 list, and the processing happens in the vendor’s cloud.
That cloud boundary is the deciding factor for SMB and mid-market firms in 2026. Any matter mix that touches engagement-letter restrictions, NDAs with AI-use clauses, outside counsel guidelines, or jurisdiction-specific confidentiality duties (ABA Opinion 512, UK SRA, Canadian Federation of Law Societies, Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules) makes vendor-cloud processing a hard sell — or an outright restriction.
A private legal AI deployment inside the firm’s tenant resolves the contractual stack by default. Same workflow capability as the vendors; SMB / mid-market economics; matter content never leaves the firm’s perimeter.
Inside a private legal AI deployment — the 8 capabilities we build
Eight capabilities the firm’s private legal AI stack delivers end-to-end — from matter document ingestion through grounded answers with inline citations to the source paragraph.
1. Matter file ingestion — every document type
PDFs (scanned and native), Word, PowerPoint, Excel, contract redlines, deposition transcripts, court filings, emails, OCR’d correspondence, structured exhibits, and tables with footnotes. The messy real-world inputs vendor RAG quietly drops chunks of — we don’t.
2. Embeddings generated inside the firm's perimeter
Choose the embedding model: OpenAI text-embedding-3 via the firm’s enterprise contract, Cohere or Voyage if licensing fits, or BGE-M3 / E5-Mistral / domain-tuned variants self-hosted inside the firm’s tenant when matter content can’t touch a vendor API. The embedding pass runs entirely behind the firm’s perimeter.
3. Self-hosted vector store sized for the firm's matter corpus
pgvector (when Postgres is the right answer), Qdrant, Weaviate, or Milvus deployed in the firm’s tenant. Tuned for legal-document structure — long-form contracts, multi-section depositions, dense market-terms playbooks, cross-matter citation chains, and matter-type templates.
4. Retrieval calibrated to the firm's playbook
Hybrid search (BM25 + vector), cross-encoder reranker, query rewriting, and multi-query fanout where it pays off. Calibrated against the firm’s market-terms playbook so deviations surface during review and matches surface during generation — not the generic median tuning vendor RAG ships with.
5. Grounded answers with paragraph-level citations
Every clause suggestion, review flag, redline, and chat answer links back to the source paragraph in the firm’s clause library or matter corpus. A suggestion that doesn’t map to a source is flagged as model-generated rather than playbook-sourced; the drafting attorney sees that distinction in the UX. The review burden shifts from “verify everything” to “verify the model-generated suggestions specifically.”
6. BYO-LLM — vendor cloud for general, self-hosted for matter-confidential
Plug in OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, or AWS Bedrock via the firm’s enterprise contract for general / non-matter work. Self-hosted Llama, Mistral, or Qwen via vLLM, SGLang, or Ollama for matter-confidential workflows that can’t touch a vendor API. Same UX for the lawyer; different model on the back end based on the matter’s confidentiality posture.
7. Air-gapped, on-prem, or in the firm's existing VPC
The full stack — ingestion, embeddings, vector store, generation, audit logging — runs in the firm’s AWS, AWS GovCloud, Azure, on-prem environment, or a firm-controlled tenant in London, Toronto, or Sydney. For air-gapped or sovereign work, the data path runs without an outbound internet connection. We’ve shipped to sovereign-cloud, classified, and on-prem environments.
8. Per-matter access control and full audit log
Each matter gets its own access policy mapped to the firm’s SSO group membership. Ethical screens, matter walls, and folder-level permissions survive into the AI layer. Every query, retrieval, clause suggestion, and model response is logged for OCG, ABA Op 512, SRA, Federation, and Law Council review. The firm gets a destruction certificate at matter close.
Talk to a private legal AI expert
Bring us the firm’s matter mix — transactional, commercial, employment, regulated-client — the engagement-letter and OCG constraints the firm operates under, and the workflows that need AI. We’ll walk through the deployment shape that fits, the timeline (typically 4–6 weeks), and what it costs vs Harvey AI annual licensing.
Ask us about
- Private RAG deployment — ingestion, embeddings, vector store, generation
- Legal matter files, M&A data rooms, regulatory and policy libraries
- Hybrid retrieval tuning with recall@k measured on your eval set
- Self-hosted embeddings and self-hosted LLM serving for sensitive corpora
- Air-gapped and on-prem deployment for classified or regulated environments
- Per-corpus access control, audit logs, and citation-enforced generation
When to choose self-hosted legal AI over vendor cloud
Harvey AI, Hebbia, Kira / Litera, Luminance, eBrevia, Spellbook, LexisNexis Protégé, and Casetext CoCounsel cover the legal AI workflow surface area. For top-tier firms with AmLaw 100 budgets and no engagement-letter friction, vendor licensing is a reasonable default.
For SMB and mid-market firms (30–300 lawyers, 50–500 contract matters a year, mixed confidentiality posture), a private legal AI deployment inside the firm’s tenant wins on three dimensions vendor licensing can’t match: contractual-stack compliance by default (no per-matter OCG review, no third-party data processor), SMB / mid-market economics (per-deployment cost below one year of major-tool licensing; cumulative cost gap widens every year), and operational simplicity (the managed engagement handles deployment, calibration, updates, and ongoing ops — no in-house AI ops staff required).
Frequently asked questions
Related solutions in the private-AI cluster
Air-Gapped AI for Regulated Industries — Disconnected LLM Deployment
AIR-GAPPED AI Air-gapped AI for classified environments and regulated industries Fully disconnected AI for classified environments, hard data-residency rules, and regulators that won't tolerate any cloud-LLM connection. Onyx + a private LLM (vLLM or Ollama) deployed inside your air-gapped network — no outbound internet required, full audit trails, FedRAMP-aligned controls. Book an Air-Gapped AI Strategy […]
Learn more →Private & On-Premise AI Solutions — Self-Hosted AI Deployment for Business
PRIVATE & ON-PREMISE AI Self-hosted AI, deployed on your infrastructure We deploy open-source AI for businesses that can't put their data in someone else's cloud — Glean alternatives, private GPT, RAG over your documents, all running in your tenant. No data leaks. No per-seat lock-in. No vendor surprises. Book a Private AI Strategy Session 5–10× […]
Learn more →Private AI Contract Review, Analysis & Lifecycle Management: Self-Hosted CLM for Law Firms and Procurement Teams
PRIVATE AI CONTRACT REVIEW & LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT Private, self-hosted ai contract review and lifecycle management for law firms and procurement teams Self-hosted clause extraction, playbook calibration, and contract analysis — privileged contract data never leaves the firm tenant. Ingestion, clause library, extraction LLM, playbook engine, review interface, and signature routing run end-to-end inside one perimeter, […]
Learn more →Private AI for Personal Injury Law Firms: Confidential Case Intake, Demand Letter Drafting, and Medical Chronology Generation
Learn more →Private ChatGPT for Business — Self-Hosted Chat for Regulated Teams
PRIVATE CHATGPT FOR BUSINESS Private ChatGPT for business, deployed on your infrastructure A self-hosted ChatGPT-style interface — LibreChat or Open WebUI — connected to your Slack, Drive, Confluence, and corporate documents. Replaces the ChatGPT Team / Plus subscriptions your employees are already paying for out of pocket. No data leaves your tenant. No per-seat surprises. […]
Learn more →Private RAG — Chat With Your Documents Inside Your Tenant
PRIVATE RAG / CHAT WITH DOCUMENTS Chat with your documents, inside your tenant Single-corpus document chat that stays inside your environment. Ideal for legal matter files, M&A data rooms, internal knowledge bases, or research libraries — the data goes in, the answers come out, nothing leaves your tenant. Citations link back to the source document, […]
Learn more →Additional resources
AI Transformation Workshop
Half-day strategy workshop to map your corpus, embedding choice, LLM routing, and private RAG deployment shape. Book a workshop →
AI Strategy Session
60-minute scoping call. We’ll talk through your corpus, document mix, and sensitivity profile, then sketch the right private RAG deployment. Book a session →
AI Consultant vs In-House Team
Honest tradeoffs on bringing a private RAG deployment in-house versus engaging a partner for build + retrieval-tuning + managed retainer. Read the comparison →
Ready to deploy private AI for the firm?
45-minute strategy session, no commitment. We’ll scope the deployment for the firm’s matter mix, contractual constraints, and workflow needs — and give a directional read on what it costs vs Harvey AI annual licensing.
